Yesterday, Paul Cormier, Executive Vice President and President, Products and Technologies, Red Hat gave a talk titled "Red Hat and the Open Source Software Business: from boxed software to a half billion dollar server company" at QUT.
Paul made two points that stand out in my mind:
- The primary differentiator of an open source project software project (compared to closed source) is in the ability to build a community of people around the project.
- He sees Red Hat as taking open source work and packaging it in a way that is palatable from an enterprise perspective. Specifically, providing stability and backward compatibility for a 'long-enough' period of time.
Having said that, I think there is a time when the cost of backwards compatibility outweighs the benefits and my threshold seems to be a fair bit lower than that of the average enterprise. In this case, I think enterprises would do well to step back and consider the real costs in doing a software project in Java (or Ruby/Groovy for that matter) and seriously consider the potential benefits from more advanced programming languages.
No comments:
Post a Comment